Study Circle 10 of 2019 – Caste and Class

DYFI CUC organised the tenth study circle of this year today. Many of us wanted to read more about the left approach to caste, and so we started by reading Anand Teltumbde’s essay called “The Caste and Class Dialectic – The Way In and the Way Out” from a compilation called Republic of Caste.


Teltumbde lays out the differences between the Marxist and Ambedkarite understandings of caste, its emergence, and strategies to annihilate it. His main point, however, is that a unified understanding of caste and class will serve both communist and anti-caste movements. 


Teltumbde charts Ambedkar’s attempts to organise people on the basis of class (such as through the Independent Labour Party) and how he did not have much success. He points out that Ambedkar’s views on Marxism had two influences: one, the Fabian Socialists in England, who preferred gradual reform over revolution; and two, the trade union movement in Bombay, which in some cases supported untouchability being practiced in factories and mills.


Here, discussions led to the emergence of many examples before the aforesaid practices in Bombay, where communist-led trade unions had mobilised against untouchability and other casteist practices, both in Bombay and in the rest of the country. Therefore Ambedkar’s Mahad satyagraha, for example, was also about the assertion of the humanity of Dalits, something that Teltumbde thinks Indian communists arrogantly dismissed. 


Teltumbde also speaks about how Marxists have taken the base-superstructure distinction too literally, and that caste needs to find its place in both, and not just in the superstructure as an institution that will die when capitalism is smashed. Here, we had some differences with Teltumbde on theory; we talked about how there was a dialectical relationship between the base and the superstructure. Teltumbde’s thrust in the article, however, was that Ambedkar’s “pragmatic” approach was reactive and Marx’s scientific approach was the correct long-term one. With that background, Teltumbde believes a meeting point between Marx and Ambedkar is necessary in India.


After much discussion – which we wish we could reproduce in its entirety here – what we took from the article was that communists had engaged insufficiently with the question of caste, and that had done a disservice to the movement, and had ceded ground to solely identitarian movements. Next week, we will read BT Ranadive’s Caste, Class and Property Relations to understand the relationship between the three.

 
Revolutionary Greetings

Central Unit Committee,

Democratic Youth Federation of India – Delhi

Study Circle 9 of 2019 – Alliances, democracy, war

DYFI-CUC organised the ninth study circle of the year today, and we finally finished reading Emile Burns’ What Is Marxism?


We read Chapter 8, A Guide To Action. The chapter emphasises the point that Marxism is not solely an academic discipline, but is meant to provide the knowledge and method to guide action towards a higher stage of production. We discussed about how that transition is not automatically made, and how suffering caused by capitalism does not by itself lead to a revolution.


The chapter discusses the Marxist answers to three questions: Which classes should ally against old systems, and when? When should communists participate in Parliamentary democracy? What kinds of wars are just wars?


The general answer is that it depends on the circumstances and on one question: do the alliances, Parliamentary participation, and war further working class interests? Even if the question is simple, the analysis has to be based on a close, often contentious, examination of circumstances.


We discussed what this means for whether Left parties in India should ally with the Congress. We talked about an essay by PMS Grewal that says that the question of this alliance is dependent on whether the Indian state is fascist or fascism is imminent. He concludes that fascism is not imminent in India, and that’s why the energies of the Left parties are better spent building an independent left movement. However, we also acknowledged that if an alliance is made, it would not necessarily be opportunistic, but likely based on a conclusion that fascism is, in fact, imminent.


We also spoke of technological monopolies and platform capitalism, and how this changes which classes should now ally against imperialism, which itself is fast-changing – big traders, for example, also find themselves threatened now.


On war, we talked about how Lenin, during the first world war, advised the working classes of the warring countries to use the inter-imperialist crisis to overthrow the ruling classes of their respective countries instead of killing fellow workers from other countries. However, during the second world war, Burns explains, the situation warranted the working classes of the allied countries to contribute to the war effort of their own ruling classes, because the fascist advance would be a setback to working class interests and liberation struggles worldwide.


For the next study circle, we voted on what topic to read about. We wanted to read about the Marxist approach to caste, the fundamentals of Marxist economics, the agrarian crisis, and the basics of Marxist philosophy. We decided to read the works of EMS Namboodiripad and BT Ranadive on caste, followed by Marx’s Wage, Labour and Capital.


Revolutionary Greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India – Delhi

Study Circle 8 of 2019 – Marxism and Science

In the weekly study circle organised by DYFI-CUC today, we studied and discussed Chapter 7 of ‘What is Marxism’ by Emile Burns, titled ‘The Marxist View of Nature’.
This chapter is of relevance to social science and political economy because Marxism is a theoretical approach based not on abstract moral principles about what a society ought to be, but one borne out of a careful study of the actually existing societies and their evolution. And actual societies, and the human beings in it, do not exist as entities independent of nature but as a part of it, and governed very much by its laws.


In opposition to the philosophy of idealism – which operates on the assumption that the material world exists only inside a human consciousness and has no independent existence outside of it – Marxism is deeply rooted in the materialist philosophy, which sees matter (the material word) as existing independently and prior to human conscious, which in itself is a product of the evolution of the former.    

And this evolution is not a linear process, but one which has a ‘dialectical’ nature, where the existence of a complex set of interrelations generate contradictions when quantitative changes occur to different variables. These contradictions are then resolved with a radical qualitative change – i.e a revolutionary transformation. Thus, “dialectical materialism” forms the central root of the marxist approach.  


Citing a scientific example, Burns says, “while the temperature is being raised the water remains water, with all the general characteristics of water, but the amount of heat in it is increasing. Similarly, while the temperature is being reduced the water remains water, but the amount of heat in it is decreasing. However, at a certain point in this process of change.. it is no longer water, but steam or ice. This feature of reality is particularly evident in chemistry.”     


Drawing a parallel to make the point that such is the nature of development in human societies also, Burns adds: “In human society, gradual changes take place over a long period without any fundamental changes in the character of society; then a break takes pace, there is a revolution, the old form of society is destroyed and a new form comes into existence and begins its own process of development. Thus within feudal society, which was production for local consumption, the buying and selling of surplus products led to the production of things for the market and so on to the beginnings of capitalist production. All of this was a gradual process of development; but at a certain point the rising capitalist class came into conflict with the feudal order, overthrew it, and transformed the whole character of production; capitalist society took the place of feudalism and began a more tempestuous development.”


This development, which created the working class, has reached a phase where the contradiction has been generated between this new class the capitalist system created and the bourgeoisie, whose revolution instated the capitalist system in place of the overthrown feudalism. The irresolvable nature of this contradiction is what throws open the road to socialist revolution, which brings about a radical transformation by demolishing capitalism and replacing it will a socialist set up.


For a more through understanding about the relationship between the laws governing nature (the material world) and the working and evolution of human societies, consult the ‘Dialectics of Nature’ by Friedrich Engels.


In the next study circle, we will read the final and the most important chapter, titled “A Guide to Action”, and finally summarise our reading of the book. Anyone interested in joining us in our studies is warmly welcome.


Revolutionary Greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India – Delhi

Study Circle 7 of 2019 – How do we build socialism?

DYFI-CUC organised the seventh study circle of this year. Today, we really put to the test everything we have learnt about historical materialism so far. We read Chapter 6 of What Is Marxism: Socialist Society.


The chapter speaks of what socialist society is likely to look like. It says that imagining a socialist society is not about taking all our favourite utopian ideas and combining them, but rather thinking of how an economy organised along socialist lines will realistically look. Socialist society, after all, emerges from capitalist society, with all its vestiges. The transition to the higher form of socialism – communism – will be impacted by these vestiges.


We had wide-ranging discussions in the course of reading this chapter: the relationship between centralisation and democracy,  central planning and quality of services, international relations from a socialist country’s point of view, women’s lives under socialism, and the question of caste-based reservations. We also discussed at length the new Constitution of Cuba, and the extensively democratic and consultative process of its drafting. The goal to create a communist society was included in the new Cuban constitution not at the insistence of the party, which had left the phrase  out, but through public demand. We spoke then of bureaucratisation in the Soviet Union, and political consciousness in Cuba.


We will keep Chapter 7: The Marxist View of Nature, as reading for homework, given that it is a chapter on Marxist philosophy that requires close, careful reading. Next week, we will discuss that chapter and read Chapter 8: A Guide to Action.


We hope to see you there, and do send us your questions and thoughts!


Revolutionary Greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India – Delhi

Study Circle 6 of 2019 – Bhagat Singh Again

DYFI-CUC organised the sixth study circle of this year on 24th February. We started reading the essay: “Shaheed Bhagat Singh an immortal revolutionary”, by Ashok Dhawale (https://www.cpim.org/marxist/200602-Bhagat-singh.pdf). Dhawale is the President of the All India Kisan Sabha. The text traces the ideological and organisational development of the revolutionary movement in the colonial era, focusing on the Ghadar party in Punjab and United Provinces, along with the HSRA. From the text it can be seen that Bhagat Singh and his comrades were shifting towards Marxism, while letting go of romantic nationalist notions.

In the discussion, we analysed the organisational methods of Indian revolutionaries, acknowledging both their successes and failures. We talked about the importance of an ideologically driven organisation for the making of a revolution. We talked about caste and its relationship with class politics. Here, we had some interesting discussions about Periyar.

We discussed the differences between the upsurges during the 19th and 20th centuries, and how the class content of the dominant anti-imperialist struggles had undergone changes.

We also discussed the demand for regional autonomy and analysed it from a class perspective.

Next week, we shall complete this text. We hope to see you there!

Revolutionary greetings,
Central Unit Committee
Democratic Youth Federation of India, Delhi

Study Circle 5 of 2019 – Class Struggle

DYFI-CUC organised the fifth study circle of the year today, and contentious discussions were had. We read Chapter 5 of What is Marxism? by Emile Burns – Class Struggles in Modern Times.


The chapter is about class and class struggle, and the basis of class struggle. It answers the question of which class leads revolutions, what the nature of the state is, representative democracy, what a dictatorship of the proletariat implies, and how the proletarian movement is a true majoritarian movement.


We discussed the difference between wealth and class: class is determined by your role in production. We talked about the concept of what is called a “middle class”, and whether it fits into Marxist class analysis. The discussion around the state was comprehensive: we talked of specific examples of how the state is an instrument of class rule, such as the bankruptcy code, suppression of land struggles, land acquisition, corporate subsidies, and so on. A question about the involvement of capitalist farmers in the All India Kisan Sabha led to an explanation of ethics under Marxism and alliances between classes. 


The second strand of discussion we had was a detailed one on Venezuela, Chavez, hoarding within Venezuela, how US imperialism functions, and the strategies available now for progressive sections in developing countries. We planned another solidarity visit to the Venezuelan embassy.


In the next study circle we will read about the life and work of Chandrashekhar Azad, as his death anniversary is on 27th February. Azad, as we know, was Bhagat Singh’s comrade and instrumental in the transformation of the Hindustan Republican Association to the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association. 


A new member brought us lovely bookmarks from the May Day Bookstore:

We would love to hear your opinions about Chapter 5, and suggestions for readings on Azad. We have also planned a study circle on Kashmir, to be organised in the coming weeks, in order that we may develop an understanding of the Kashmir crisis, a first step to any resolution of it.


Revolutionary greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India, Delhi

Study Circle 4 of 2019 – Imperialism

DYFI-CUC organised the fourth study circle of the year – an emotional one, because we heard Salvador Allende’s last speech before he was killed by a CIA-led military coup. He addresses the women, workers and farmers of Chile and denounces imperialism and foreign capital. In the final seconds of the recording you can hear explosions, and then, silence. Not a happy video to watch, but as Allende said: social processes can be arrested neither by crime nor force. History is ours, and people make history. 


Appropriately, we read the fourth chapter of Emile Burns’s What Is Marxism?: The Imperialist Stage of Capitalism


The chapter is about Lenin’s explanation of the development of capitalism since the death of Marx: the imperialist stage is characterised by the export of monopoly finance capital and the dividing up of the world among finance capital groups.


We discussed concentration of economic power in Indian finance capital, the role of bank nationalisation in helping capitalism progress, attempts in Europe to reject austerity and why they failed, and the imperialist aggression against Venezuela.
Speaking of Venezuela, CUC members visited the Venezuelan embassy on Friday to attend a solidarity meeting against US imperialism. If you are in Delhi, we urge you to visit the embassy and sign the solidarity statement.


Next Sunday, we will read Chapter 5: Class Struggles in Modern Times. If you would like to come for the next study circle, please try to read the first four chapters. If you cannot, we will be happy to answer doubts and queries.

Revolutionary Greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India, Delhi

Study Circle 2 of 2019 – What Is Marxism?

DYFI Central Unit Committee, Delhi, organised the second study circle of the year on 27 January. This is an update on what was discussed.


We read the first two chapters of Emile Burns’s What Is Marxism? The chapters are “A Scientific View Of The World” and “The Laws Of Social Development”. We discussed what is meant by historical materialism, the meaning of a class, class consciousness, the difference between utopian and scientific socialism, and where ideas come from. An interesting aside was on how innovation functions in capitalist and socialist societies. The discussion then moved to contemporary issues of globalisation, de-linking, and data governance. Find Burns’s book here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/burns-emile/1939/what-is-marxism/index.htm


In the next study circle next Sunday, we will continue with Burns’s book and read the third chapter, “Capitalist Society”.


Revolutionary greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India, Delhi

Study Circle 1 of 2019 – Bhagat Singh’s Letter to Young Political Workers

DYFI-Central Unit Committee, Delhi, organised the first study circle of 2019 today. This is an update on what was discussed:


Today we read Bhagat Singh’s Letter to Young Political Workers. Because there were many new people, the letter served as a great introduction to the purpose of left organising. Find it here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/bhagat-singh/1931/02/02.htm


There was discussion about the nature of the state, mass uprisings, compromise, tactics and strategy. Bhagat Singh also talks of the importance of study circles 🙂 We talked about what the letter meant for organising in India today, with examples of land struggles, peasant struggles and trade unionism. The letter is quite short, please go through it and let us know your thoughts!


Next week we will be reading Emile Burns’ What Is Marxism? This is a short book that takes you through the Marxist worldview, including its analysis of reality, history, capitalism, imperialism, and ideas about socialism. Find it here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/burns-emile/1939/what-is-marxism/index.htm


Revolutionary greetings,

Central Unit Committee

Democratic Youth Federation of India, Delhi