DYFI CUC organised the tenth study circle of this year today. Many of us wanted to read more about the left approach to caste, and so we started by reading Anand Teltumbde’s essay called “The Caste and Class Dialectic – The Way In and the Way Out” from a compilation called Republic of Caste.
Teltumbde lays out the differences between the Marxist and Ambedkarite understandings of caste, its emergence, and strategies to annihilate it. His main point, however, is that a unified understanding of caste and class will serve both communist and anti-caste movements.
Teltumbde charts Ambedkar’s attempts to organise people on the basis of class (such as through the Independent Labour Party) and how he did not have much success. He points out that Ambedkar’s views on Marxism had two influences: one, the Fabian Socialists in England, who preferred gradual reform over revolution; and two, the trade union movement in Bombay, which in some cases supported untouchability being practiced in factories and mills.
Here, discussions led to the emergence of many examples before the aforesaid practices in Bombay, where communist-led trade unions had mobilised against untouchability and other casteist practices, both in Bombay and in the rest of the country. Therefore Ambedkar’s Mahad satyagraha, for example, was also about the assertion of the humanity of Dalits, something that Teltumbde thinks Indian communists arrogantly dismissed.
Teltumbde also speaks about how Marxists have taken the base-superstructure distinction too literally, and that caste needs to find its place in both, and not just in the superstructure as an institution that will die when capitalism is smashed. Here, we had some differences with Teltumbde on theory; we talked about how there was a dialectical relationship between the base and the superstructure. Teltumbde’s thrust in the article, however, was that Ambedkar’s “pragmatic” approach was reactive and Marx’s scientific approach was the correct long-term one. With that background, Teltumbde believes a meeting point between Marx and Ambedkar is necessary in India.
After much discussion – which we wish we could reproduce in its entirety here – what we took from the article was that communists had engaged insufficiently with the question of caste, and that had done a disservice to the movement, and had ceded ground to solely identitarian movements. Next week, we will read BT Ranadive’s Caste, Class and Property Relations to understand the relationship between the three.
Revolutionary Greetings
Central Unit Committee,
Democratic Youth Federation of India – Delhi

